Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Do international parliaments matter? An empirical analysis of influences on foreign policy and civil rights

Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias ORCID: 0000-0003-4637-9477 and Bareis, Luka (2022) Do international parliaments matter? An empirical analysis of influences on foreign policy and civil rights. European Journal of International Relations, 28 (4). 983 - 1008. ISSN 1460-3713

[img] Text (Do international parliaments matter? An empirical analysis of influences on foreign policy and civil rights) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (216kB)

Identification Number: 10.1177/13540661221123026

Abstract

International parliamentary institutions (IPIs), which give parliamentarians regular opportunities to communicate with their foreign counterparts, have become a common feature in global governance. Recent research has shed light on why IPIs are created, on the similarities and differences in their institutional design, and on the reasons that lead members of national parliaments to engage with them. By contrast, there is little systematic empirical research on whether and how IPIs affect global politics. This article addresses this question by assessing their ability to influence states in relation to the position they take on issues of global concern and to how they treat their own citizens. The study identifies several mechanisms of IPI influence, leading to the hypothesis that more frequent opportunities for parliamentarians to interact with their foreign counterparts within IPIs leads in time to greater similarity in the foreign policy positions expressed by their governments and affects how those governments protect the civil rights of their citizens. A statistical analysis spanning multiple international organizations, member states, and decades indicates that IPIs offer a distinct contribution to convergence in foreign policy. By contrast, participation in IPIs is not robustly associated with civil rights protections. The finding that IPIs can be consequential on which policies governments promote internationally even though such institutions typically lack substantial authority may be encouraging for advocates of further international parliamentarization and specifically the creation of a United Nations parliamentary assembly.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/ejt
Additional Information: © 2022 The Author(s).
Divisions: Government
Subjects: J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
J Political Science > JZ International relations
Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2022 13:27
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2024 07:33
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/115991

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics