Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Political implications of ‘green’ infrastructure in one’s ‘backyard’: the Green Party’s Catch 22?

Mitsch, Frieder and McNeil, Andrew ORCID: 0000-0003-0791-9143 (2022) Political implications of ‘green’ infrastructure in one’s ‘backyard’: the Green Party’s Catch 22? Working Papers (81). International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

[img] Text (WP-81_political-implications-of-green-infrastructure--published) - Published Version
Download (1MB)

Abstract

A clean environment is a public good, with the benefits shared by all. While most individuals can agree on the need to implement green policies, we argue that the cost-benefit calculation is quite different depending on where one lives. Those individuals living in places where green infrastructure is infeasible, such as cities, can advocate for green technologies knowing that the chance of having to bear the cost of infrastructure in their ‘backyard’ is low. We test how the building of wind turbines and solar farms changes one’s political preferences in the German state of Baden-Württemberg. We use a difference-indifference design based on whether one’s area is designated for potential infrastructure in the future. We show that when the burden of ‘green’ infrastructure falls on voters, wind turbines or solar farms in one’s ‘backyard’, these local authorities vote less for the Green Party. Additionally, using individual level data from SOEP, we find that it is those individuals who previously voted Green who are the most likely to desert their party in the face of green infrastructure, rather than disincentivising potential ‘switchers’. We argue that this has profound implications for the move to ‘net zero’. Green parties face a Catch22 situation, the very policies that draw their support create a backlash when implemented.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Official URL: https://www.lse.ac.uk/International-Inequalities/P...
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors
Divisions: Government
International Inequalities Institute
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Date Deposited: 01 Jun 2022 14:42
Last Modified: 01 Jun 2022 14:42
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/115269

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics