Holzhauser, Nicole (2021) Who gets to be a classic in the social sciences? Impact of Social Sciences Blog (18 Oct 2021). Blog Entry.
Text (impactofsocialsciences-2021-10-18-who-gets-to-be-a-classic-in-the)
- Published Version
Download (196kB) |
Abstract
Of all the ideas produced by researchers in the social sciences, only a relatively small number of key ideas and researchers will become canonised as classics, objects of continued interest and key learning points for new researchers. However, the processes by which these scholars and ideas are recognised and filtered out from those of their contemporaries are little understood. Drawing on a quantitative study of sociologists in the 20th century, Nicole Holzhauser, argues that not only the content of scientific work, but also social capital has historically played a significant role in allocating recognition and power within the field, although, social capital alone is insufficient to achieve lasting success. Taking this historical example into account, contemporary researchers might carefully consider the factors that shape how they allocate recognition through citation.
Item Type: | Online resource (Blog Entry) |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
Additional Information: | © 2021 The Author |
Divisions: | LSE |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jan 2022 14:51 |
Last Modified: | 14 Sep 2024 03:17 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/112850 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |