Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Can routine health facility data be used to monitor subnational coverage of maternal, newborn and child health services in Uganda?

Agiraembabazi, Geraldine, Ogwal, Jimmy, Tashobya, Christine, Kananura, Rornald Muhumuza ORCID: 0000-0002-9915-1989, Boerma, Ties and Waiswa, Peter (2021) Can routine health facility data be used to monitor subnational coverage of maternal, newborn and child health services in Uganda? BMC Health Services Research, 21 (Suppl 1). ISSN 1472-6963

[img] Text (s12913-021-06554-6) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (985kB)
Identification Number: 10.1186/s12913-021-06554-6

Abstract

Background: Routine health facility data are a critical source of local monitoring of progress and performance at the subnational level. Uganda has been using district health statistics from facility data for many years. We aimed to systematically assess data quality and examine different methods to obtain plausible subnational estimates of coverage for maternal, newborn and child health interventions. Methods: Annual data from the Uganda routine health facility information system 2015–2019 for all 135 districts were used, as well as national surveys for external comparison and the identification of near-universal coverage interventions. The quality of reported data on antenatal and delivery care and child immunization was assessed through completeness of facility reporting, presence of extreme outliers and internal data consistencies. Adjustments were made when necessary. The denominators for the coverage indicators were derived from population projections and health facility data on near-universal coverage interventions. The coverage results with different denominators were compared with the results from household surveys. Results: Uganda’s completeness of reporting by facilities was near 100% and extreme outliers were rare. Inconsistencies in reported events, measured by annual fluctuations and between intervention consistency, were common and more among the 135 districts than the 15 subregions. The reported numbers of vaccinations were improbably high compared to the projected population of births or first antenatal visits – and especially so in 2015–2016. There were also inconsistencies between the population projections and the expected target population based on reported numbers of antenatal visits or immunizations. An alternative approach with denominators derived from facility data gave results that were more plausible and more consistent with survey results than based on population projections, although inconsistent results remained for substantive number of subregions and districts. Conclusion: Our systematic assessment of the quality of routine reports of key events and denominators shows that computation of district health statistics is possible with transparent adjustments and methods, providing a general idea of levels and trends for most districts and subregions, but that improvements in data quality are essential to obtain more accurate monitoring.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/
Additional Information: © 2021 The Authors
Divisions: International Development
Subjects: R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics > RJ101 Child Health. Child health services
Date Deposited: 22 Sep 2021 09:48
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2021 03:02
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/111966

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics