Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Are landscape approaches possible under authoritarianism? Multi-stakeholder governance and social transformation in Myanmar

Forsyth, Tim and Springate-Baginski, Oliver (2021) Are landscape approaches possible under authoritarianism? Multi-stakeholder governance and social transformation in Myanmar. Environmental Science and Policy, 124. 359 - 369. ISSN 1462-9011

[img] Text (Kachin Landscapes_submitted version_July2021) - Accepted Version
Repository staff only until 15 July 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (476kB) | Request a copy

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.010

Abstract

Landscape Approaches have been proposed as a transferable model of multi-stakeholder governance, yet assume conditions of ideal speech, trust, and transparency that seem untransferable to authoritarian regimes. This paper argues that building Landscape Approaches under authoritarian conditions cannot be based on a governance deficit model of awaiting idealized political conditions, but instead needs to pay attention to how local social and political structures influence what is deliberated, and by whom. The paper presents evidence from a multi-stakeholder environmental intervention around Lake Indawgyi in Kachin State, Myanmar, to draw lessons for transferring Landscapes Approaches under conditions of political authoritarianism, sporadic violent conflict, and rapid socio-economic change. Using information gathered from village surveys and interviews with policymakers, the paper analyzes how multifunctionality, stakeholder engagement, and deliberation are achieved, and with whose influence. The paper argues that common principles of Landscapes Approaches need to acknowledge more how state-led agendas can influence agendas and participation in conservation; but also how the composition and interests of stakeholders are not fixed under socio-economic transformation. Focusing on local and contextual drivers of environmental change and political inequality are more useful for transferring Landscape Approaches to authoritarian regimes than adhering to optimistic principles, or testing associations between variables without reference to context. Indeed, the latter risks depoliticizing conflictual processes, and implicitly endorsing political inequalities. The 2021 military coup in Myanmar has added to these inequalities.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1462...
Additional Information: © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Divisions: International Development
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Date Deposited: 15 Jul 2021 17:15
Last Modified: 30 Jul 2021 07:42
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/111039

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics