The truth about better understanding?

Ross, Lewis ORCID: 0000-0001-9683-9924 (2023) The truth about better understanding? Erkenntnis, 88 (2). 747 - 770. ISSN 1572-8420

Text (Ross_the-truth-about-better-understanding--published) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (687kB)

Abstract

The notion of understanding occupies an increasingly prominent place in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and moral theory. A central and ongoing debate about the nature of understanding is how it relates to the truth. In a series of influential contributions, Catherine Elgin has used a variety of familiar motivations for antirealism in philosophy of science to defend a non-factive theory of understanding. Key to her position are: (1) the fact that false theories can contribute to the upwards trajectory of scientific understanding, and (2) the essential role of inaccurate idealisations in scientific research. Using Elgin’s arguments as a foil, I show that a strictly factive theory of understanding has resources with which to offer a unified response to both the problem of idealisations and the role of false theories in the upwards trajectory of scientific understanding. Hence, strictly factive theories of understanding are viable notwithstanding these forceful criticisms.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.springer.com/journal/10670
Additional Information:	© 2021 The Authors
Divisions:	Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Date Deposited:	19 Feb 2021 11:12
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 08:00
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/108875

Actions (login required)

View Item