Criminal law at the limit: countering false claims in elections and referendums

Horder, Jeremy ORCID: 0000-0002-7922-9574 (2021) Criminal law at the limit: countering false claims in elections and referendums. Modern Law Review, 84 (3). pp. 429-455. ISSN 0026-7961

Text (Horder_criminal-law-at-the-limit--published) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (254kB)

• Author

Abstract

When should the criminal law intervene to deter and punish the promulgation of falsehoods that are intended to influence political – electoral or referendum - campaigns? I will scrutinise the protection that UK criminal law provides for the interests of candidates, referendum campaigners and voters, from the (potential) effects of damaging falsehoods. I suggest that neither the protection of candidates’ or campaigners’ reputations, nor the promotion of the public good of collective decision-making by voters based on accurate and adequate information, in themselves provide sufficient reasons for criminal law intervention. Falsehoods must normally be intended to threaten, undermine or prevent effective participation in the political process before the intervention of the criminal law is justified.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682230
Additional Information:	© 2021 The Author
Divisions:	Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	19 Jan 2021 11:39
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 02:25
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/108493

Actions (login required)

View Item