Amior, Michael (2020) Immigration, local crowd-out and undercoverage bias. CEP Discussion Papers (1669). Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, London, UK.
Text (dp1669)
- Published Version
Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Revised May 2020. Revised January 2021. Using decadal census data since 1960, I cannot reject the hypothesis that new immigrants crowd out existing residents from US commuting zones and states one-for-one. My estimate is precise and robust to numerous specifications, as well as accounting for local dynamics; and I show how it can be reconciled with apparently conflicting results in the literature. Exploiting my model's structure, I attribute 30% of the observed effect to mismeasurement, specifically undercoverage of immigrants. Based on a remarkably simple decomposition, I show that population mobility accounts for 90% of local adjustment, and labor demand the remainder. These results have important methodological implications for the estimation of immigration effects.
Item Type: | Monograph (Discussion Paper) |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion... |
Additional Information: | © 2020 The Authors |
Divisions: | Centre for Economic Performance |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JV Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
JEL classification: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies > J61 - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies > J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search R - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jan 2021 11:00 |
Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 19:37 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/108490 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |