In cities, it’s not far, but it takes long: comparing estimated and replicated travel times to reach lifesaving obstetric care in Lagos, Nigeria

Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi ORCID: 0000-0002-4449-0131, Wong, Kerry LM, Ayomoh, Francis Ifeanyi, GiwaAyedun, Rokibat Olabisi and Benova, Lenka (2021) In cities, it’s not far, but it takes long: comparing estimated and replicated travel times to reach lifesaving obstetric care in Lagos, Nigeria. BMJ Global Health, 6 (1). ISSN 2059-7908

Text (“In cities, it’s not far, but it takes long”: comparing estimated and replicated travel times to reach life-saving obstetric care in Lagos, Nigeria) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (1MB)

• Author

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Travel time to comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) facilities in low-resource settings is commonly estimated using modelling approaches. Our objective was to derive and compare estimates of travel time to reach CEmOC in an African megacity using models and web-based platforms against actual replication of travel. METHODS: We extracted data from patient files of all 732 pregnant women who presented in emergency in the four publicly owned tertiary CEmOC facilities in Lagos, Nigeria, between August 2018 and August 2019. For a systematically selected subsample of 385, we estimated travel time from their homes to the facility using the cost-friction surface approach, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) and Google Maps, and compared them to travel time by two independent drivers replicating women's journeys. We estimated the percentage of women who reached the facilities within 60 and 120 min. RESULTS: The median travel time for 385 women from the cost-friction surface approach, OSRM and Google Maps was 5, 11 and 40 min, respectively. The median actual drive time was 50-52 min. The mean errors were >45 min for the cost-friction surface approach and OSRM, and 14 min for Google Maps. The smallest differences between replicated and estimated travel times were seen for night-time journeys at weekends; largest errors were found for night-time journeys at weekdays and journeys above 120 min. Modelled estimates indicated that all participants were within 60 min of the destination CEmOC facility, yet journey replication showed that only 57% were, and 92% were within 120 min. CONCLUSIONS: Existing modelling methods underestimate actual travel time in low-resource megacities. Significant gaps in geographical access to life-saving health services like CEmOC must be urgently addressed, including in urban areas. Leveraging tools that generate 'closer-to-reality' estimates will be vital for service planning if universal health coverage targets are to be realised by 2030.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://gh.bmj.com/
Additional Information:	© 2021 The Authors
Divisions:	LSE Health
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Date Deposited:	04 Jan 2021 12:51
Last Modified:	30 Nov 2024 02:27
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/108161

Actions (login required)

View Item