In the name of parliamentary sovereignty: how the conflict between the UK government and the courts over prisoner voting rights was really about executive power

Hardman, Helen (2019) In the name of parliamentary sovereignty: how the conflict between the UK government and the courts over prisoner voting rights was really about executive power. Democratic Audit Blog (11 Jun 2019). Blog Entry.

Text (dit-com-2019-06-11-in-the-name-of-parliamentary-sovereignty-how-the) - Published Version Download (118kB)

• https://www.democraticaudit.com/2019/06/...

Abstract

In UK political disputes over European Court of Human Rights judgments, such as the high-profile objections to rulings on prisoner voting, much political capital is made out of the claim that the European Court is impinging on UK parliamentary sovereignty. However, Helen Hardman argues that the objections have instead been based on concern that court rulings would limit the decision-making powers of the government, rather than the independence and sovereignty of parliament. Archival and interview data demonstrate that the strategic purpose of the stand-off against the European Court was directed at weakening the European Convention system because it empowers UK domestic courts to effectively challenge government policy.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://www.democraticaudit.com/
Additional Information:	© 2019 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
Date Deposited:	19 Jan 2021 13:45
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 02:42
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/108144

Actions (login required)

View Item