Unjust enrichment: what we owe to each other

Cutts, Tatiana (2020) Unjust enrichment: what we owe to each other. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. ISSN 0143-6503

Text (Unjust Enrichment- What We Owe to Each Other) - Accepted Version Download (528kB)

Abstract

In some quarters, the focus of unjust enrichment scholarship has shifted from loss and gain towards the defendant’s ‘involvement in the story’—what she has done to warrant liability. The goal of this shift is to fit unjust enrichment within the ‘doer-sufferer’ template of ‘corrective justice’ theories of private law. I argue that this shift fails to reconcile unjust enrichment with the commitment to equal freedom upon which these theories depend. But we can justify restitution without forsaking the Kantian concern with rational agency. In this article, I endorse a contractualist approach to mistaken payments: a particular use of the state’s coercive power is just if it is one that everyone could rationally choose; everyone could rationally choose a rule placing the burden of risk for mistake with payees, if that rule does not make any such payee worse off than she was prior to the impugned transaction.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://academic.oup.com/ojls
Additional Information:	© 2020 The Author
Divisions:	Law School
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	04 Aug 2020 16:18
Last Modified:	20 May 2025 03:27
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/105865

Actions (login required)

View Item