Writing for edited collections represents a model for a creative academic community unfairly rejected by the modern academy

Webster, Peter (2020) Writing for edited collections represents a model for a creative academic community unfairly rejected by the modern academy. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (12 Jun 2020). Blog Entry.

Text (impactofsocialsciences-2020-06-12-writing-for-edited-collections) - Published Version Download (117kB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsc...

Abstract

Edited collections, are one of the most disparaged forms of academic writing, often written off as low quality, or a poor career choice. In contrast, Peter Webster argues for the unique benefit of edited collections, as a creative form of collective academic endeavour that does not sit easily within an academy that is averse to creative risk.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2020 The Author
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform A General Works > AS Academies and learned societies (General) A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship The Humanities
Date Deposited:	24 Jul 2020 10:57
Last Modified:	15 Sep 2023 10:37
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/105438

Actions (login required)

View Item