Webster, Peter (2020) Writing for edited collections represents a model for a creative academic community unfairly rejected by the modern academy. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (12 Jun 2020). Blog Entry.
![[img]](http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (impactofsocialsciences-2020-06-12-writing-for-edited-collections)
- Published Version
Download (117kB) |
Abstract
Edited collections, are one of the most disparaged forms of academic writing, often written off as low quality, or a poor career choice. In contrast, Peter Webster argues for the unique benefit of edited collections, as a creative form of collective academic endeavour that does not sit easily within an academy that is averse to creative risk.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Blog Entry) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2020 The Author |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform A General Works > AS Academies and learned societies (General) A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship The Humanities |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Jul 2020 10:57 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 20:11 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/105438 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics