De Meza, David  ORCID: 0000-0002-5638-8310 and Reito, Francesco 
  
(2020)
Too much waste, not enough rationing: the failure of stochastic, competitive markets.
    Journal of Economic Theory, 188.
    
     ISSN 0022-0531
ORCID: 0000-0002-5638-8310 and Reito, Francesco 
  
(2020)
Too much waste, not enough rationing: the failure of stochastic, competitive markets.
    Journal of Economic Theory, 188.
    
     ISSN 0022-0531
  
  
  
| ![[img]](http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) | Text (Too much waste, not enough rationing)
 - Accepted Version Download (306kB) | 
Abstract
There are good reasons why sellers often post prices before the realization of demand shocks. We study whether equilibrium prices chosen ex ante coincide with the ex-ante prices that maximize expected aggregate surplus. The main result is that even in the competitive limit there is a divergence. Waste is excessive and entry decisions are distorted. The problem is that for competitive firms to sell in low-demand states involves a costly sacrifice of high-state revenue.
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Official URL: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-e... | 
| Additional Information: | © 2020 Elsevier Inc. | 
| Divisions: | Management | 
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HG Finance | 
| JEL classification: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies | 
| Date Deposited: | 17 Apr 2020 15:54 | 
| Last Modified: | 11 Sep 2025 10:15 | 
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/104084 | 
Actions (login required)
|  | View Item | 
 
                                     Download Statistics
 Download Statistics Download Statistics
 Download Statistics