To address the rise of predatory publishing in the social sciences, journals need to experiment with open peer review.

Heimstädt, Maximilian and Dobusch, Leonhard (2020) To address the rise of predatory publishing in the social sciences, journals need to experiment with open peer review. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (10 Jan 2020). Blog Entry.

Text (impactofsocialsciences_2020-01-10-to-address-the-rise-of-predatory) - Published Version Download (192kB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsc...

Abstract

Predatory journals are here, but our attention to them is unevenly distributed. Most studies on predatory publishing have looked at the phenomenon in the natural and life sciences. In this post, Maximilian Heimstädt and Leonhard Dobusch analyse the harmful potential of predatory journals for social science and specifically management research. Identifying key threats posed by predatory publishing, they argue that open peer review could stand to mitigate some of these challenges and foster a more constructive form of knowledge production.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2020 The Authors
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources Q Science > Q Science (General)
Date Deposited:	11 Mar 2020 11:15
Last Modified:	11 Dec 2024 19:59
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/103732

Actions (login required)

View Item