Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Penal (Ant)Agonism

Koehler, Johann August (2019) Penal (Ant)Agonism. Law and Social Inquiry, 44 (3). pp. 799-805. ISSN 0897-6546

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1017/lsi.2019.32

Abstract

In Breaking the Pendulum, Goodman, Page, and Phelps (2017) advance an “agonistic” perspective that contends struggle drives penal change, and that it does so through perpetual conflict. Yet studying only manifest struggles, when an actor made their resistance to a penal status quo known, presents thorny problems in conceptualizing conflict. One such problem is that conflict among agonists advocating competing penal policies presupposes consensus between those who threaten penal order’s basic conditions. Understanding penal agonism’s corollary, penal antagonism, offers a more complete starting point from which to theorize penal history and penality.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-so...
Additional Information: © 2019 American Bar Foundation
Divisions: Social Policy
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited: 08 Nov 2019 19:06
Last Modified: 21 Nov 2019 00:17
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/102428

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item