Amicus curiae briefs in the WTO DSM: good or bad news for non-state actor involvement?

Squatrito, Theresa Jeanne ORCID: 0000-0002-6726-7629 (2017) Amicus curiae briefs in the WTO DSM: good or bad news for non-state actor involvement? World Trade Review, 17 (1). pp. 65-89. ISSN 1474-7456

Text (Amicus curiae briefs) - Accepted Version Download (394kB)

• https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/a...

Abstract

Since 1998, non-state actors have had access to submit an ‘amicus curiae’ brief to the WTO DSM. Like other forms of non-state actor involvement in the WTO, amicus curiae access has been controversial. Despite this controversy, non-state actors have made use of this access and submitted amicus curiae briefs. This article asks: What has come of these briefs once they are submitted and what explains how amicus are treated by the DSM? This article empirically maps amici in all disputes from 1998 (after amicus access was first recognized) through 2014, arguing that amicus access is conditioned by a combination of political and legal constraints faced by the WTO panels and AB. In particular, whether the content of an amicus is considered hinges on it having the endorsement of a disputing party and whether its consideration interferes with the WTO DSM's reputation for coherence. In all, these findings have implications for the debate over whether amicus curiae access is good or bad news for the WTO and non-state actor involvement.

Item Type:	Article
Divisions:	International Relations
Date Deposited:	23 Sep 2019 12:18
Last Modified:	20 Dec 2024 00:36
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101701

Actions (login required)

View Item