Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES)

Griffiths, Alys W., Wood, Alexander Mathew, Maltby, John, Taylor, Peter J., Panagioti, Maria and Tai, Sara (2015) The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES). Psychological Assessment, 27 (4). 1182 - 1194. ISSN 1040-3590

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1037/pas0000110

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that defeat (conceptualized as a failed social struggle) and entrapment (conceptualized as a perceived inability to escape from aversive situations) form a single construct that reliably predicts psychopathological outcomes in clinical and community settings. However, scales designed to assess defeat and entrapment measure the constructs separately, whereas recent evidence suggests a single scale would be appropriate. Existing scales may also be too lengthy to have clinical utility. The present study developed and evaluated a scale that measured both defeat and entrapment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that defeat and entrapment were best defined by a single factor, and 8 items were selected that best represented this construct to form the short scale. The scale had high internal consistency (α = .88 to .94), showed criterion validity with hopelessness (r = .45 to .93) and incremental validity for caregiver burden when controlling for depression and positive symptoms of psychosis when controlling for hopelessness (β = .45 to .60). Additionally, the scale had excellent test-retest reliability using single measures absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients across 12 months (ricc = .88 to .92) within 4 samples: people with posttraumatic stress disorder, people with psychosis, care home employees, and people from community settings. The scale demonstrated known group validity through discrimination between clinical and nonclinical groups of participants. This scale could be implemented within therapeutic settings to help clinicians identify patients experiencing defeat and entrapment, and incorporate these factors into their clinical assessment and case formulations for treatment.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/pas/
Additional Information: © 2015 American Psychological Association
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited: 05 Sep 2019 23:10
Last Modified: 20 Jan 2020 07:00
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101505

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item