Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Epistemic network injustice

Spiekermann, Kai (2019) Epistemic network injustice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics. ISSN 1470-594X (In Press)

[img] Text (Epistemic network injustice) - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.

Download (871kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

To find out what is in one’s own best interest, it is helpful to ask one’s epistemic peers. However, identifying one’s epistemic peers is not a trivial task. I consider a stylized political setting, an electoral competition of ‘Masses’ and ‘Elites’. To succeed, the Masses need to know which alternative on offer is truly in their interest. To find out, the Masses can pool their privately held information in a preelection ballot, provided that they can reliably find out with whom they should pool information. I investigate the process of finding the relevant peer group for information pooling by modeling this group formation process as dynamic network change. The simulations show that the Masses can succeed in finding the right peers, but they also suggest reasons why the Elites may often be more successful. This phenomenon generalizes to the notion of Epistemic Network Injustice. Such injustice arises when a subset of citizens is systematically deprived of connections to helpful epistemic peers, leading to their reduced political influence. Epistemic Network Injustice is a new form of epistemic injustice, related to but distinct from the notion introduced by Miranda Fricker.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 The Author
Divisions: Government
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2019 14:06
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2019 23:10
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101304

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics