Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Is peer review a good idea?

Heesen, Remco and Bright, Liam Kofi (2019) Is peer review a good idea? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. ISSN 0007-0882

[img] Text (Is peer review a good idea?) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (327kB)
Identification Number: 10.1093/bjps/axz029

Abstract

Prepublication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change will have on the social structure of science, paying particular attention to the changed incentive structure and the likely effects on the behaviour of individual scientists. We evaluate these changes from the perspective of epistemic consequentialism. We find that where the effects of abolishing prepublication peer review can be evaluated with a reasonable level of confidence based on presently available evidence, they are either positive or neutral. We conclude that on present evidence abolishing peer review weakly dominates the status quo.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 The Authors
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Date Deposited: 29 Jul 2019 15:54
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2020 00:24
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101242

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics