Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Decentering technology in discourse on discrimination

Gangadharan, Seeta Peña and Niklas, Jedrzej (2019) Decentering technology in discourse on discrimination. Information, Communication & Society, 22 (7). 882 - 899. ISSN 1369-118X

[img] Text (Decentering technology in discourse on discrimination) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Identification Number: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1593484

Abstract

Algorithmic discrimination has become one of the critical points in the discussion about the consequences of an intensively datafied world. While many scholars addAlgorithmic discrimination has become one of the critical points in the discussion about the consequences of an intensively datafied world. While many scholars address this problem from a purely techno-centric perspective, others try to raise broader social justice concerns. In this article, we join those voices and examine norms, values, and practices among European civil society organizations in relation to the topic of data and discrimination. Our goal is to decenter technology and bring nuance into the debate about its role and place in the production of social inequalities. To accomplish this, we rely on Nancy Fraser’s theory of abnormal justice which highlights interconnections between maldistribution of economic benefits, misrecognition of marginalized communities, and their misrepresentation in political processes. Fraser’s theory helps situate technologically mediated discrimination alongside other more conventional kinds of discrimination and injustice and privileges attention to economic, social, and political conditions of marginality. Using a thematic analysis of 30 interviews with civil society representatives across Europe’s human rights sector, we bring clarity to this idea of decentering. We show how many groups prioritize the specific experiences of marginalized groups and ‘see through’ technology, acknowledging its connection to larger systems of institutionalized oppression. This decentered approach contrasts the process-oriented perspective of tech-savvy civil society groups that shy from an analysis of systematic forms of injustice.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Divisions: Media and Communications
Subjects: J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe)
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Date Deposited: 08 Mar 2019 11:57
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2020 05:33
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/100227

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics