Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems

Tebboth, M.G.L., Conway, D. ORCID: 0000-0002-4590-6733 and Adger, W.N. (2019) Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems. Global Environmental Change, 54. pp. 172-183. ISSN 0959-3780

[img] Text (Mobility Endowment) - Accepted Version
Download (397kB)

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.002


In economically marginal rural areas, choice in livelihood strategy such as decisions to move location mediates levels of individual and household resilience under conditions of environmental change. It is widely recognised that endowments associated with mobility and the entitlement to mobility are unevenly distributed across populations. This paper integrates these insights and conceptualises location choice as a set of mobility endowments and mobility entitlements. Through focussing on endowments and entitlements, the paper explores how choice affects the ability to be mobile and its role in mediating levels of resilience to livelihood shocks associated with changing environmental conditions. The research design involves measuring the impact of different climatic perturbations in rural locations in Anhui Province, China. Mixed methods of rural appraisal, life history interviews, and a household survey generate objective and perceived elements of individual and household responses to risks. These data are augmented by biophysical observations on the nature of the climatic perturbations. The results show that mobility endowments and mobility entitlements are important in determining the impact of mobility on resilience. The life history interview data highlight significant individual agency within the structures that impact on individual choices. Further, individuals and households who possess the ability to decide and to subsequently enact decisions about mobility, are shown to be more resilient compared to other individuals and households that lack such ability. Moreover, households practicing short-term, circular mobility are more resilient than those households that practice long-term mobility. The study confirms that, in these instances, choice and the ability to enact those choices mediates resilience and highlights the implications of location decisions but also the conditions in which those decisions are made.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JV Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration
Date Deposited: 05 Mar 2019 16:48
Last Modified: 18 Jul 2024 21:06

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics