Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Value assessment of disease-modifying therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: HTA evidence from seven OECD countries

Visintin, Erica, Tinelli, Michela ORCID: 0000-0002-8816-4389 and Kanavos, Panos ORCID: 0000-0001-9518-3089 (2019) Value assessment of disease-modifying therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: HTA evidence from seven OECD countries. Health Policy, 123 (2). pp. 118-129. ISSN 0168-8510

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.019

Abstract

This study systematically compares HTA recommendations on a number of disease–modifying therapies for patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. We analysed publicly available HTA reports for nine medicine-indication pairs across seven OECD countries using a methodological framework enabling systematic analysis of HTA recommendations. The analysis was conducted based on a number of value dimensions, including clinical and economic variables, as well as several other dimensions of value beyond cost-effectiveness. The material was qualitatively and quantitatively coded following the different stages of HTA decision-making process. Fifty-seven medicine-indication pairs were assessed across the study countries. Of those, eight medicine indication-pairs reported diverging HTA recommendations. Although HTA recommendations were based on the same evidence submitted in most cases, significant variations were identified in interpretation and acceptance of evidence resulting in different uncertainties raised and different ways of addressing them. Uncertainties arose both in terms of the clinical and the economic evidence, including the design of key trials or the data quality in economic models. Beyond costs and effects, additional dimensions of value had an impact in the direction of recommendations, however with different magnitude across countries. We show that there is heterogeneity across countries in HTA for evaluating DMTs for RRMS with a lack of standardised methods in evaluating clinical and economic evidence and the use of social value judgments to inform decision-making.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/health-policy
Additional Information: © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Divisions: Health Policy
Subjects: R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Date Deposited: 04 Mar 2019 15:18
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2024 04:09
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/100178

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item