Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

A manifesto for a progressive land-grant mission in an authoritarian populist era

Goldstein, Jenny E., Paprocki, Kasia and Osborne, Tracey (2019) A manifesto for a progressive land-grant mission in an authoritarian populist era. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109 (2). pp. 673-684. ISSN 2469-4452

[img] Text (Goldstein et al A Manifesto for a Progressive Land Grant Mission) - Accepted Version
Repository staff only until 11 February 2020.

Download (217kB) | Request a copy

Identification Number: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1539648

Abstract

In this article, we offer a manifesto for a progressive twenty-first century land-grant mission in an era of rising authoritarian populism in the United States. We explore the historical context of this mode of political engagement, argue that scholars based at land-grant universities are uniquely positioned to address this political moment, and offer examples of land-grant scholars who have embraced this political obligation directly. In the midst of the U.S. Civil War, the federal government provided grants of land to one college in every state to establish universities especially with extension-oriented missions committed to agricultural research and training; today, there are seventy-six land-grant universities. Just as the constitution of these universities at a significant moment in the country’s history served a political purpose, the current political climate demands a robust political response from contemporary land-grant scholars. Given the mandate for land-grant universities to serve their communities, how can a critical land-grant mission respond to the current political moment of emergent authoritarian populism in the United States and internationally? What responsibilities are entailed in the land-grant mission? We consider some strategies that land-grant scholars are employing to engage with communities grappling most directly with economic stagnation, climate change, and agrarian dispossession. We also suggest that, amid the dramatically shifting political climate in the United States, all scholars regardless of land-grant affiliation should be concerned with land-grant institutions’ capacities to engage with the country’s most disenfranchised populations as a means to pushing back against authoritarian populism.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 American Association of Geographers
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General)
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2019 15:18
Last Modified: 21 May 2019 23:06
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/100084

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics