Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

The 30 by 30 biodiversity commitment and financial disclosure: metrics matter

Silvestro, Daniele, Goria, Stefano, Groom, Ben ORCID: 0000-0003-0729-143X, Sterner, Thomas and Antonelli, Alexandre (2025) The 30 by 30 biodiversity commitment and financial disclosure: metrics matter. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 77. ISSN 1877-3435

[img] Text (1-s2.0-S1877343525000806-main) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB)

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101587

Abstract

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework commits nearly 200 nations to protect 30% of their territories. Given financial constraints, the ‘easiest’ approach to comply would be to protect the cheapest areas. But what would this mean for biodiversity conservation, and how could financial disclosure support — or undermine — success? We showcase and discuss the biological and financial consequences of area protection and restoration selected under various metrics, and highlight the potential of emerging approaches powered by artificial intelligence to guide biodiversity conservation. Through extensive simulations, we show that spatial restoration planning using the CAPTAIN model (Conservation Area Prioritization through Artificial Intelligence) can lead to substantial improvements in predicted outcomes across a wide range of biodiversity metrics. Corporate disclosure provides a common mechanism for reducing environmental damage and increasing conservation, but is often dependent on simplistic and suboptimal metrics, which can lead to significantly lower benefits to nature compared with more comprehensive approaches. Alternative methodologies, building upon technological and computational advances and developed through collaboration between economists, biologists, and data scientists, can provide more cost-effective mechanisms to improve biodiversity outcomes and support implementation of the Global Biodiversity Framework.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions: Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Date Deposited: 11 Nov 2025 11:24
Last Modified: 11 Nov 2025 11:24
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/130100

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics