Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

An economic model to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of different hip prostheses and factors associated with changes in cost-effectiveness rankings

Bevan, Gwyn and Baxter, K. (1999) An economic model to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of different hip prostheses and factors associated with changes in cost-effectiveness rankings. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53 (9). pp. 542-547. ISSN 1470-2738

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative costs of prostheses and factors associated with changes in these cost rankings. DESIGN AND SETTING: Economic model using published data. MAIN RESULTS: The main cost drivers are current costs and revision rates. Expected revision costs are a small proportion of the expected total costs. There are few competitors to the "gold standard" Charnley in terms of total expected costs over 20 years. There is no monetary advantage in using higher cost prostheses in older patients even if they were to have lower revision rates. There may be a monetary case for using prostheses with higher costs and lower revision rates in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: The most cost effective prosthesis in older patients is the Stanmore. The Charnley, Exeter Polished and Muller Straight Stem are marginally more costly than the Stanmore. The study inevitably lacks good data on survival for newer prostheses. This does not affect the ability to make choices for older patients. Data are needed, however, on survival of cemented prostheses for younger patients.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://jech.bmj.com
Additional Information: © 1999 Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Library of Congress subject classification: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Sets: Departments > Management
Rights: http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/usingTheLibrary/academicSupport/OA/depositYourResearch.aspx
Date Deposited: 13 Feb 2010 15:52
URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/7541/

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only