Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

A rational path towards a Pareto optimum for reforms of large state-owned enterprise in China, past, present and future

Liu, Xiaojie, Shen, Jim Huangnan and Deng, Kent (2016) A rational path towards a Pareto optimum for reforms of large state-owned enterprise in China, past, present and future. Economic History Working Papers (244/2016). Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Since Deng Xiaoping’s historic move towards a market economy in post-Mao China during the 1980s, by far, the most challenging task in China’s reforms has been that related to the moribund state-owned sector due to a range of ideological, political, as well as economic reasons. Such reforms have so far been slow and hesitant, moving forward and backward with mixed results. This paper tackles the pros and cons of such reforms and aims to square a rational strategy based on what has been done so far in the state sector. Unlike a narrow approach currently prevailing in the literature, this paper establishes a partial equilibrium model which incorporates the principal-agent problem into a mixed oligopoly model to explore an optimal strategy for state-owned enterprise reforms in China. We argue that ceteris paribus the current illnesses of low efficiency and rent-seeking commonly suffered by China’s state-owned sector can be cured by a two-pronged strategy in which the importance of property rights holds the key. We have identified two ‘Coase Property Right Points’ in the commonly known choices of institutional changes in a reforming Soviet economy to firstly, make it more efficient, and then Pareto optimal. One institutional change is a ‘joint-stock reform’; the other, a ‘full privatisation reform’. In particular, this study regards ‘social-extra policy burdens’ as the main obstacle to improve much needed efficiency in the state sector. Coase Property Right Points show the necessity for a reduction of the social-extra policy burdens vis-à-vis the state sector’s true comparative advantage

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Official URL: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/economicHistory/workingPaper...
Additional Information: © 2016 The Authors
Divisions: Economic History
Subjects: D History General and Old World > DS Asia
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
JEL classification: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P20 - General
P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P26 - Political Economy; Property Rights
P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P31 - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions
Sets: Departments > Economic History
Collections > Economists Online
Date Deposited: 27 Jun 2016 14:08
Last Modified: 24 May 2019 23:21
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67019

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics