Barta, Zsofia and Schelkle, Waltraud (2015) At cross-purposes: commercial versus technocratic governance of sovereign debt in the EU. Journal of European Integration, 37 (7). pp. 833-846. ISSN 0703-6337
|
PDF
- Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 April 2017. Download (526Kb) |
Abstract
A perennial problem for fiscal governance in the euro area has been the lack of support from markets. Far from disciplining budgetary policies, capital flows financed deficits at historically low interest rates even when they broke EU fiscal rules. Theory would lead us to expect that the international-commercial and the supranational-technocratic assessments of sovereign debt are fairly aligned. But they were not. We show that credit rating agencies (CRAs) and Eurostat have rather different assessments of what certain policies mean for sovereign debt: the privatization of state-owned enterprises, pension reforms and more recently bank rescue programs. These assessments reveal divergent approaches. Private agencies are prone to conformism and herding behavior, allowing for little consistent discipline, while the public agency follows a bureaucratic imperative of accountability and transparency, which gets in the way of evolving policy priorities. Our findings thus shed light on the difficulties of fiscal governance by regulation only.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/geui20 |
| Additional Information: | © 2015 Taylor & Francis |
| Library of Congress subject classification: | J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) |
| Sets: | Departments > European Institute |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Apr 2015 13:40 |
| URL: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61667/ |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Record administration - authorised staff only |

Download statistics
Download statistics