Cowell, Frank A., Fleurbaey, Marc and Tungodden, Bertil (2015) The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation. Social Choice and Welfare, 45 (4). pp. 765-792. ISSN 0176-1714
|
PDF
- Accepted Version
Download (726Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
When forming their preferences about the distribution of income, rational people may be caught between two opposite forms of “tyranny.” Giving absolute priority to the worst-off imposes a sort of tyranny on the rest of the population, but giving less than absolute priority imposes a reverse form of tyranny where the worst-off may be sacrificed for the sake of small benefits to many well-off individuals. We formally show that this intriguing dilemma is more severe than previously recognised, and we examine how people negotiate such conflicts with a questionnaire-experimental study. Our study shows that both tyrannies are rejected by a majority of the participants, which makes it problematic for them to define consistent distributive preferences on the distribution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.springer.com/gb/ |
| Additional Information: | © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 |
| Library of Congress subject classification: | H Social Sciences > HA Statistics H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology |
| Sets: | Departments > Economics Research centres and groups > Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD) Research centres and groups > Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Apr 2015 13:39 |
| URL: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61663/ |
Actions (login required)
 |
Record administration - authorised staff only |
Download statistics
Download statistics