Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?

Bovens, Luc (2015) Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it? Journal of Medical Ethics, 41 (8). pp. 630-634. ISSN 0306-6800

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (373kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102329

Abstract

Belgium has recently extended its euthanasia legislation to minors, making it the first legislation in the world that does not specify any age limit. I consider two strands in the opposition to this legislation. First, I identify five arguments in the public debate to the effect that euthanasia for minors is somehow worse than euthanasia for adults—viz. arguments from weightiness, capability of discernment, pressure, sensitivity and sufficient palliative care—and show that these arguments are wanting. Second, there is another position in the public debate that wishes to keep the current age restriction on the books and have ethics boards exercise discretion in euthanasia decisions for minors. I interpret this position on the background of Velleman’s “Against the Right to Die” and show that, although costs remain substantial, it actually can provide some qualified support against extending euthanasia legislation to minors.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://jme.bmj.com/
Additional Information: © 2015 British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics > RJ101 Child Health. Child health services
Sets: Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Date Deposited: 23 Feb 2015 12:20
Last Modified: 10 Sep 2015 23:00
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/61046

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics