Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a manual-based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of carers of people with dementia

Livingston, Gill and Barber, Julie and Rapaport, Penny and Knapp, Martin and Griffin, Mark and Romeo, Renee and King, Derek and Livingston, Debbie and Lewis-Holmes, Elanor and Mummery, Cath and Walker, Zuzana and Hoe, Juanita and Cooper, Claudia (2014) START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a manual-based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of carers of people with dementia. Health Technology Assessment, 18 (61). pp. 1-242. ISSN 1366-5278

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (30MB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.3310/hta18610

Abstract

The frequency of dementia is rising as people live longer, meaning that there are more people with dementia, two-thirds of whom are cared for at home by their families. About 40% of those family carers of people with dementia have clinically significant depression or anxiety, often leading to them becoming unable to care so that the person with dementia has to be looked after in a care home. Although there have been some interventions which help reduce family carers’ depression and anxiety, they have neither been designed to be used routinely in the NHS nor had their cost-effectiveness tested. Our START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study was a randomised controlled trial of an eight-session manual, adapted from an American programme called ‘Coping with Caregiving’. It was delivered by psychology graduates to carers individually. We compared it with usual treatment by using a computer program to decide randomly whether or not carers should be in the intervention or the control group. We found that START decreased carers’ anxiety and depression and improved their quality of life (QoL) in the short term (8 months after the study started) and that it was as effective on these measures in the longer term (2 years after the study started). The intervention was cost-effective at both times but did not improve the person with dementia’s QoL. After 2 years, there was a small, but not significant, decrease in the chance of people with dementia in the intervention group being admitted to a care home.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta
Additional Information: © 2014 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Sets: Departments > Social Policy
Research centres and groups > Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)
Research centres and groups > NIHR School for Social Care Research
Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2014 11:40
Last Modified: 05 Mar 2015 14:14
Funders: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/59966

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics