Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Special majorities rationalized

Goodin, Robert E and List, Christian (2006) Special majorities rationalized. British Journal of Political Science, 36 (2). pp. 213-241. ISSN 1469-2112

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published version)
Download (340Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Author's final manuscript)
Download (375Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Complaints are common about the arbitrary and conservative bias of special-majority rules. Such complaints, however, apply to asymmetrical versions of those rules alone. Symmetrical special-majority rules remedy that defect, albeit at the cost of often rendering no determinate verdict. Here what is formally at stake, both procedurally and epistemically, is explored in the choice between those two forms of special-majority rule and simple-majority rule; and practical ways are suggested of resolving matters left open by symmetrical special-majority rules – such as ‘judicial extrapolation’ or ‘subsidiarity’ in a federal system.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_JPS
Additional Information: © 2006 Cambridge University Press
Library of Congress subject classification: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Sets: Departments > Government
Research centres and groups > Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS)
Rights: http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/usingTheLibrary/academicSupport/OA/depositYourResearch.aspx
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2008 13:46
URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/5826/

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics