Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Neither the T index nor the D2score Measure “two-partyness”: a comment on gaines and taagepera

Dunleavy, Patrick (2014) Neither the T index nor the D2score Measure “two-partyness”: a comment on gaines and taagepera. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24 (3). pp. 362-385. ISSN 1745-7289

Full text not available from this repository.


This comment critiques the paper by Gaines and Taagepera (2013) outlining two new measures that compare how far election outcomes diverge from a particular ideal of "perfect two-partyness" (one in which all votes are divided equally between the top two parties). Their first proposed T index is an unstable amalgam of two different measures, one linear and the other not. Applied to analysing sets of election outcomes, it systematically mis-signals "two-partyness" in its accepted meaning, producing perverse results. Their second index, D2, has a varying minimum size level depending on the size of the largest party (P1) and the number of observable parties competing. In many circumstances D2 scores bifurcate - the same scores are produced by both very low and very high P1 levels. Applied to distributions, the D2 score artefactually homogenizes very dissimilar distributions, again misreads even two-party configurations, and always overstates "two-partyness" in multi-party systems. I conclude that neither the T nor D2 indices are fit for purpose. They should not be further used in electoral analysis.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2014 Elections, Public Opinion & Parties.
Library of Congress subject classification: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Sets: Departments > Government
Research centres and groups > LSE Public Policy Group
Date Deposited: 09 Jun 2014 16:11

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only