Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Unveiling information on opportunity costs in REDD: Who obtains the surplus when policy objectives differ?

Delacote, Philippe, Palmer, Charles, Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim and Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark (2014) Unveiling information on opportunity costs in REDD: Who obtains the surplus when policy objectives differ? Resource and Energy Economics, 36 (2). pp. 508-527. ISSN 0928-7655

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.07.002


Improving information about individual opportunity costs of deforestation agents has the potential to increase the efficiency of REDD when it takes the form of a payment for environmental services scheme. However, objectives pursued in REDD projects may vary across policy makers. Within a theoretical framework, this paper explores the impacts of different policy objectives under two opportunity cost settings: asymmetric and full information. For a policy maker aiming to maximize net income from REDD, having full information may not increase the amount of forest conserved but could lead to a redistribution of rents away from agents. By contrast, for an environmental policy maker focused on maximizing the amount of forest conserved under REDD having full information increases the amount of forest conserved while reducing the rents received by agents. For a policy maker pursuing poverty alleviation objectives in REDD-affected communities, having full information makes no difference to overall welfare as rents remain with agents. The amount of deforestation avoided will at least be as high as under asymmetric information. These results are illustrated with data collected on opportunity costs in Amazonas State, Brazil.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General)
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Sets: Departments > Geography and Environment
Date Deposited: 01 Apr 2014 16:05
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2019 19:32
Projects: NEWFOREX (no. 243950)
Funders: European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013), Danish National Science Foundation

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item