Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Similarities and differences among the Taiwan, China, and Hong-Kong versions of the WHOQOL questionnaire

Yao, Grace and Wu, Chia-huei (2009) Similarities and differences among the Taiwan, China, and Hong-Kong versions of the WHOQOL questionnaire. Social Indicators Research, 91 (1). pp. 79-98. ISSN 0303-8300

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11205-008-9326-4

Abstract

To facilitate comparison across cultures, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been developing a universal measure of quality of life (QOL) called the WHOQOL Questionnaire. This questionnaire contains 24 facets organized into six broad domains: physical, psychological, level of independence, social relationships, environment, and spirituality/religion/personal beliefs. The standard WHOQOL is designed for cross-cultural comparison. However, to obtain a valid QOL measure that can be applied in diverse populations, cultural adaptation of the WHOQOL has been encouraged. Each culture is permitted to add culture-specific questions, called national items, so that the questionnaire can also reflect cultural attributes. Three Chinese versions of the WHOQOL have been developed for China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. National items were selected for each version according to the criteria proposed by the WHOQOL Group. The purpose of this paper is to compare the Taiwan version to the China and Hong Kong versions. The questionnaire development process, response scale generation, psychometric properties (reliability and validity), national items, and population means were all examined. Results indicated that not only is cultural adaptation of WHOQOL measures necessary for individual cultures, but also for sub-cultures, as these differences must be considered in order to provide effective health care and treatment.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/journal/11...
Additional Information: © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Divisions: Management
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Sets: Departments > Management
Date Deposited: 06 Sep 2013 12:10
Last Modified: 20 Jul 2019 01:22
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51720

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item