Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data

Potoglou, Dimitris, Burge, Peter, Flynn, Terry, Netten, Ann, Malley, Juliette, Forder, Julien and Brazier, John E. (2011) Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data. Social Science & Medicine, 72 (10). pp. 1717-1727. ISSN 0277-9536

Download (832kB) | Preview
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.027


This paper presents empirical findings from the comparison between two principal preference elicitation techniques: discrete choice experiments and profile-based best–worst scaling. Best–worst scaling involves less cognitive burden for respondents and provides more information than traditional “pick-one” tasks asked in discrete choice experiments. However, there is lack of empirical evidence on how best–worst scaling compares to discrete choice experiments. This empirical comparison between discrete choice experiments and best–worst scaling was undertaken as part of the Outcomes of Social Care for Adults project, England, which aims to develop a weighted measure of social care outcomes. The findings show that preference weights from best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiments do reveal similar patterns in preferences and in the majority of cases preference weights – when normalised/rescaled – are not significantly different.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
Divisions: Personal Social Services Research Unit
LSE Health
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Sets: Research centres and groups > Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)
Research centres and groups > LSE Health
Date Deposited: 08 Mar 2012 10:29
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2021 04:42

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics