Kukathas, Chandran (2009) One cheer for Constantinople: a comment on Pettit and Skinner on Hobbes and freedom. Hobbes Studies, 22 (2). pp. 192-198. ISSN 0921-5891
Philip Pettit and Quentin Skinner find Hobbes's understanding of freedom as non-interference inadequate because it fails to appreciate what is wrong with a life lived as a slave. Though their critiques have some force, however, Hobbes's view of freedom has virtues of its own. It is highly sensitive to the fact that freedom is a matter of degree. It is also unlikely to mistake freedom for something else, like security or dignity. Moreover, Hobbes is not as unmindful of the dangers of servility as many think.
|Additional Information:||© 2009 Brill|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
|Sets:||Departments > Government|
|Date Deposited:||21 Jun 2011 14:04|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|