Dunleavy, Patrick (2011) The Research Excellence Framework is lumbering and expensive: for a fraction of the cost, a digital census of academic research would create unrivalled and genuine information about UK universities’ research performance. British Politics and Policy at LSE (09 Jun 2011) Blog Entry.
- Published Version
Download (57Kb) | Preview
Government efforts at assessing university research via the REF involve universities and hundred of senior academics in perpetuating a mythical, bureaucratic form of ‘peer review’. Inherently these exercises only produce ‘evidence’ that has been fatally structured from the outset by bureaucratic rules and university games-playing. Patrick Dunleavy argues that in the digital era, this mountain of special form-filling and bogus ‘reviewing by committee’ has become completely unnecessary.
|Item Type:||Website (Blog Entry)|
|Additional Information:||© 2011 the author|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
|Sets:||Departments > Government
Collections > British Politics and Policy at LSE
Research centres and groups > LSE Public Policy Group
|Date Deposited:||14 Jun 2011 14:24|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|