Amiel, Yoram and Cowell, Frank (2007) On the measurement of polarisation: a questionnaire study. 90. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Download (880Kb) | Preview
Starting from the axiomatisation of polarisation contained in Esteban and Ray (1994) and Chakravarty and Majumdar (2001) we investigate whether people's perceptions of income polarisation is consistent with the key axioms. This is carried out using a questionnaire-experimental approach that combines both paper questionnaires and on-line interactive techniques. The responses suggest that important axioms which serve to differentiate polarisation from inequality - e.g. increased bipolarisation - as well as other distinctive features of polarisation, i.e. the non-monotonous behaviour attributed to polarisation, are not widely accepted.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Discussion Paper)|
|Additional Information:||© 2007 the authors|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Polarisation, income distribution, inequality|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance|
|Journal of Economic Literature Classification System:||D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement|
|Sets:||Collections > Economists Online
Departments > Economics
Research centres and groups > Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD)
Research centres and groups > Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE)
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|