Coco, Giuseppe and de Meza, David (2001) In defence of usury laws. Discussion paper, 369. Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Download (339Kb) | Preview
This paper shows that if moral hazard leads to credit rationing, an appropriate usury law must raise social welfare. Under market clearing, a usury law is always beneficial if funds are inelastically supplied. When entrepreneurial heterogeneity is introduced, an improvement arises even when the supply of funds is elastic. These results apply also in costly stateverification models and diversionary models of the credit market. Finally, a usury law proves useful in eliminating low-yielding projects when some entrepreneurs display excess optimism.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Discussion Paper)|
|Additional Information:||© 2001 The Authors|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||H Social Sciences > HG Finance
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
|Sets:||Research centres and groups > Financial Markets Group (FMG)
Collections > Economists Online
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|