List, Christian, Luskin, Robert C., Fishkin, James S. and McLean, Iain (2006) Deliberation, single-peakedness, and the possibility of meaningful democracy: evidence from deliberative polls. PSPE working papers, 01-2006. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Download (308Kb) | Preview
Majority cycling and related social choice paradoxes are often thought to threaten the meaningfulness of democracy. But deliberation can prevent majority cycles – not by inducing unanimity, which is unrealistic, but by bringing preferences closer to single-peakedness. We present the first empirical test of this hypothesis, using data from Deliberative Polls. Comparing preferences before and after deliberation, we find increases in proximity to single-peakedness. The increases are greater for lower versus higher salience issues and for individuals who seem to have deliberated more versus less effectively. They are not merely a byproduct of increased substantive agreement (which in fact does not generally increase). Our results both refine and support the idea that deliberation, by increasing proximity to single-peakedness, provides an escape from the problem of majority cycling.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Working Paper)|
|Additional Information:||© 2006 The Authors|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||J Political Science > JA Political science (General)|
|Sets:||Departments > Government
Research centres and groups > Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS)
Research centres and groups > Political Science and Political Economy Group
|Date Deposited:||29 Jul 2008 08:59|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|